A report led by Jeremy Corbyn has concluded that the British government bears responsibility for contributing to the killing of Palestinian civilians, citing continued military and political support during the ongoing genocidal war in Gaza. The findings, released on 16 March following hearings held in Westminster last year, present a detailed case that London failed to meet its legal obligations to prevent atrocities.

The inquiry, often referred to as the “Gaza Tribunal”, brought together legal experts, former officials and witnesses, drawing on testimonies and documented evidence. Its conclusions argue that the UK should have immediately halted arms exports to Israel, particularly given mounting indications of violations of international law. Instead, the report suggests that only limited restrictions were imposed, allowing the broader framework of military cooperation to continue largely unchanged.

Particular attention is given to Britain’s role in supplying components linked to advanced fighter aircraft used in strikes on Gaza. The report highlights how industrial contributions within the UK form a significant part of these systems, raising questions about indirect involvement in military operations. It also challenges the government’s internal review processes, which reportedly dismissed the overwhelming majority of examined cases as compliant with international humanitarian standards.

The findings emerge against the backdrop of increasing domestic pressure, as activists and political figures call for greater accountability. The tribunal itself was established after the government declined to launch an independent investigation into its own conduct. Critics argue that this refusal reflects a broader pattern of avoiding scrutiny while maintaining strategic ties.

Beyond foreign policy, the report points to a tightening domestic climate in which expressions of solidarity with Palestinians have faced restrictions. Arrests of demonstrators and legal actions against activist groups have intensified, fuelling concerns over the use of counter-terrorism measures in a political context. The tribunal’s organisers say their work aims to challenge that environment and push for transparency, accountability and a reassessment of Britain’s role.